Trademark Dispute Resolution: Confusion Between ARME and ARMO
By Vera Abogados

On December 26, 2013, the Delegated Superintendent for Industrial Property of the Superintendence of Industry and Commerce (SIC) of Colombia issued Resolution 85569, refusing to register the mark "ARMO" due to the opposition filed by ARME S.A. ARME argued that the trademark "ARMO" was confusingly similar to its previously registered trademark "ARME" for similar goods and services.
However, in a subsequent proceeding, the SIC reversed its decision and allowed the registration of "ARMO." ARME alleged that this decision violated Decision 486, the Andean Community's common regime on industrial property, because it did not consider the likelihood of confusion between the trademarks.
On June 29, 2023, the Administrative Chamber of the Council of State found that there is indeed a competitive connection between the goods and services of the trademarks due to their complementarity and joint use. The Chamber also stated that the trademarks share the same genre, marketing channels, and advertising, which could lead to consumer confusion as to the origin of the businesses. Therefore, the Chamber concluded that the trademarks cannot coexist in the market without creating a likelihood of confusion, and thus upheld ARME's business activity.