Rosado Muñoz v. Acevedo Marrero, 2016 TSPR 236

By Ferraiuoli LLC

Rosado Muñoz v. Acevedo Marrero, 2016 TSPR 236
On November 23rd, 2016, the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (hereinafter, the “Supreme Court”) issued an opinion in the case of Rosado Muñoz v. Acevedo Marrero, 2016 TSPR 236, regarding intellectual property rights, which in said jurisdiction are subject to federal and local statutes. The controversy revolved around the question of whether works of art created by an artist during a period of Conjugal Partnership, and which the creator possessed in the moment of his death, where deemed community or separate property.

The Supreme Court, in the reference case, stated that works of art not subject to contracts of economic exploitation or that have not been ceded upon the death of the author, belong exclusively to its author and consequently to the hereditary estate, although not derivative fruits, income, or interest generated by works of art created before or during the period of Conjugal Partnership. This, despite the fact that for their creation, funds from the Conjugal Partnership or goods obtained by the industry, salary of work of any spouse.

The Supreme Court highlighted that the Puerto Rico Author’s Moral Rights Act, Act Num. 55-2012 (hereinafter, “Author’s Moral Rights Act”), clearly states that the moral rights of an artist are inalienably personal. Works of arts however are goods that in this case where created during the Conjugal Partnership, which is governed by the Civil Code of Puerto Rico, 31 LPRA 3621 et seq.

This created a conflict between both statutes to which the Supreme Court argued it would have to find a way to reconcile both of them according to their motives.

The Court reasoned that the Author’s Moral Rights Act is a special law attending a specific matter, and for this reasons it should precede the Civil Code’s, 31 LPRA 3647, general character. Since the Author’s Moral Rights Act does not contemplate the Conjugal Partnership in its provisions, and clearly states how a work of art is an inalienably personal right, it was interpreted as separate property in the Conjugal Partnership. This statute recognizes the ownership of a work of art or creation, as well as the rights to dispose of it, to disclose it, and to retract it. For these reasons, the Supreme Court understood these creations could not be automatically considered community property in a Conjugal Partnership.
Ferraiuoli LLC

Ferraiuoli LLC (FLLC) was founded in 2003 by the late Blas Ferraiuoli-Martínez, Eugenio Torres-Oyola and María Marchand-Sánchez. This group was then joined in 2004 by Fernando J. Rovira-Rullán, thus forming the founding core of FLLC. FLLC has grown exponentially since its founding from a law firm with three attorneys and a support staff of three to its current size of 54 attorneys with a support staff of 38. Also, FLLC has grown from initially being known as an intellectual property and corporate law boutique law firm to a multiservice law firm that handles most matters relevant to a business while continuing to earn praise for its leading intellectual property and corporate practices.

FLLC has been ranked as a leading law firm in Puerto Rico by the professional publication Chambers Latin America in intellectual property, corporate, bankruptcy, labor & employment, real estate, and tax law. Moreover, 17 FLLC partners have been ranked as leaders in their field by the same publication. 4 FLLC partners are ranked as leaders in Intellectual Property, no other firm has more than 2. This recognition in such a short period of time is a tribute to FLLC’s business model.

FLLC prides itself in doing its work faster and more cost-efficiently yet with the same quality as that of its main competitors. The founding name partners are available at all times to attend to client matters. Their work ethic sets the tone for the rest of the firm. FLLC’s founders’ goal has been steady from the outset: become one of the premier multiservice law firms in Puerto Rico.

Visit Website