Rules governing PTAB review practices in various proceedings
By Ferraiuoli LLC
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) seeking public input on proposals to codify many existing Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) review policies and practices. These proposals would improve fairness, transparency, and efficiency in PTAB processes, further evolving and strengthening the proceedings of USPTO’s patents judicial Board.
The proposals in the NPRM reflect public feedback starting with a 2020 Request for Comments that received more than 820 comments and a 2023 Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) that resulted in 14,500 comments, as well as comments received in other fora, expressing a preference that key policy changes be formalized through rulemaking. The proposed rules address a subset of topics from the ANPRM; other topics raised in the ANPRM are still under consideration.
The proposed rules would enhance and build on existing precedent and guidance to determine whether to institute an AIA proceeding with regard to serial petitions, parallel petitions, and petitions implicating the same or substantially the same art or arguments previously presented to the USPTO. The proposed rules would also establish a separate briefing process for discretionary institution arguments and align the procedures for termination of proceedings pre- and post-institution.
